My policies

  • Although this blog does not accept comments, I welcome thoughtful non-anonymous emails to lribstei at gmail.com and may discuss them in blog posts. Let me know if I may use your name. Although I'm a law professor, I don't give legal advice.

Me

My audience

Blog powered by TypePad

« Schelling's Nobel | Main | The Drezner tenure denial »

Miers and business

Gordon Smith notes big business’ support of Miers because of her experience representing big business clients, and therefore a possibly greater willingness to take business cases. Gordon observes:

As a consumer of the Supreme Court's opinions on securities matters, my general inclination is to be thankful that the Court doesn't take more business matters. The Justices and their clerks often seem quite out of their depth on business issues.

Amen (if I can still use such a word).  To be sure, it’s bad that we have to, for example, wait 20 years to get any clarification of fraud on the market, as we did between Basic and Dura.  And what we got from Dura was at least a curtailing of this misbegotten theory. However, as I discussed in my Fraud on a Noisy Market, Dura raises more questions than it answers.    Moreover, as I wrote yesterday, I’m dubious about what we’ll get on market issues from a Justice Miers. 

Nor does Miers' representation of big business particularly cheer me.  Big firms are not for free markets – they’re for a marketplace tilted in their direction, and particularly for more federal law, as long as the federal law is more favorable for them than dealing with state law. Federalizing one market after another (think Sarbox, which business largely supported when enacted) is bad in principle and usually leads to more problems than it solves. Given time and appropriate choice of law rules (see my From Efficiency to Politics in Contractual Choice of Law, 37 Georgia Law Review 363 (2003)), states can solve excessive litigation problems more effectively than a blunt one-size-fits-all federal statute.

My point is not at all that we should oppose Miers because she's represented big business, but simply that this is not a reason to support her, given the other problems with her nomination.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c88c69e200e5505440fd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Miers and business:

» Yikes from PointOfLaw Forum
John Fund of the WSJ doesn't name his White House source on this, and of course the possibility remains that it's entirely mistaken:"[B]usiness may not be getting quite what the White House packagers are touting. ... One White House source... [Read More]

Comments

Heard on the Sunday talk shows:

A Supreme Court justice has only one client: the Constitution.

This is a fine blog and i will definately bookmark it. I have a site that covers pretty much related stuff ( business leads ) - Business leads.

Thanks!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.