My policies

  • Although this blog does not accept comments, I welcome thoughtful non-anonymous emails to lribstei at gmail.com and may discuss them in blog posts. Let me know if I may use your name. Although I'm a law professor, I don't give legal advice.

Me

My audience

Blog powered by TypePad

« Eat your chocolate | Main | Lessons from the dumping and suing debate »

The attack on the shorts

Tom Kirkendall and the WSJ write about the infamous SEC subpoenas to journalists arising out of the Overstock.com short-seller controversy, a controversy which is apparently still smoldering despite Cox's backtrack.

This is all part of the age-old attack on short-sellers as market manipulators. The attack is occurring on many fronts. One is “dumping and suing” – my current salvo on that point is up at PointofLaw’s Featured Discussion. Another is the role of hedge funds in takeovers, particular including the Richard Perry/Mylan/King incident. Much more on both in an article by Bruce Kobayashi & me that will be posted shortly.

Short-sellers are inviting regulatory targets for three reasons. First, they are apple-cart-upsetting contrarians. This does not sit well with the powers that be, particularly including incumbent managers, who rely on favorable assessments of the activities to stay in power.

Second, opponents of short-sellers gain traction from naïve populist theories of capitalism. Short-selling seems to be “mere” speculation, therefore zero-sum, not socially productive.

Third, short-selling in fact is often accompanied by bad manipulation – since short-selling is short-term speculation, there’s a temptation to make prices move in the short term by spreading lies. But that's a red herring, because there are general laws against lying and manipulation.

Before succumbing to the temptation to regulate, we must keep in mind that short-sellers are significant potential contributors to market efficiency. Indeed, the SEC rule restricting short-sales (Rule10a-1–10a-2) contributes to market inefficiency by inhibiting arbitrage on the downside. See my Fraud on a Noisy Market for more background. 

The Houston Chronicle's Loren Steffy reminds us (tipped by Tom K) that short-sellers were the first to spot problems at Enron. Short-selling might help nip the next Enron.

The regulation of short-selling is a perfect example of how regulation begets more regulation. For example, if we had more of it, we wouldn’t need to worry as much about analysts being coopted, and hence have less need for the analyst regulation in SOX and for Regulation FD, which is aimed partly at the danger firms will buy off analysts with information.

The attack on short sellers only became a big issue recently when the SEC came after the journalists. (First they came for the short-sellers. . . ). And of course that brings in the First Amendment, which as we all know is designed only for journalists, our most important speakers.

But we shouldn’t let these relatively side issues obscure the essential perversity of attacking short-selling. To the extent that short-sellers break the law, as by manipulating or lying, they should be punished with everybody else. But short-selling is more a solution to market inefficiency than a problem in itself.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c88c69e200e55054418c8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The attack on the shorts:

» Criminalizing the business reporters from Houston's Clear Thinkers
The increasing criminalization of business took an interesting turn earlier this week when the Securities and Exchange Commission's San Francisco office subpoenaed email and other documents from several journalists, including one who works at Dow Jones... [Read More]

» Standing Up for Free Markets from Gary Weiss Blog
The anti-shorting cult doesn't want free markets. They want freedom -- the freedom to sell stocks in cruddy companies, and smear and bully critics like [Herb] Greenberg, with as little government interference as possible. But when these same stocks d... [Read More]

» Short 'em, then sue 'em from PointOfLaw Forum
A reminder that our Featured Discussion between Moin Yahya and Larry Ribstein has been proceeding through the week. Their topic: what if anything should be done about the phenomenon of lawyers' or their confederates' selling short the stocks of target... [Read More]

» Market efficiency, incentives and regulation from PointOfLaw Featured Discussion
The NYT's Joe Nocera writes about "the anguish of being an analyst." The problem is that it's hard for analysts to get paid in an efficient market, where the value of information is dissipated as soon as it's used. This... [Read More]

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.