My policies

  • Although this blog does not accept comments, I welcome thoughtful non-anonymous emails to lribstei at gmail.com and may discuss them in blog posts. Let me know if I may use your name. Although I'm a law professor, I don't give legal advice.

Me

My audience

Blog powered by TypePad

« My investiture talk: on markets | Main | Suze speaks »

Ben Stein speaks

Here's what's on Ben Stein's "mind" in today's NYT:

  • $10 million bat mitzvahs are killing soldiers in Iraq. He "reasons" that the rich party-givers got the money from a tax cut that is starving the soldiers. The tax cut is also raising the deficit.  Look elsewhere for hard thoughts about whether we should starve the soldiers, bring them home, reduce the deficit, or tax the rich so that they don't have as much for the caterers.
  • He's still raging about going private transactions, this time Four Seasons. This one is particularly bad because Bill Gates is investing in it, and he's too rich already.
  • Ben still had some space to fill, so he gave a couple of his brain cells over to why foreign listings are down in NY.

Why should we read this? Because Ben is (according to the company that rents him out to Bat Mitzvahs or wherever he entertains)

[a]n exceptionally gifted economist. . . An unlikely Renaissance man, Stein’s career achievements range from speechwriter for President Nixon to the pop icon who starred as Ferris Bueller’s teacher. He is, above all, an expert on bringing meaning to both life and work.

By the way, according to Wikipedia, this "exceptionally gifted economist" apparently got his training by majoring in economics in college, from which he graduated about 40 years ago (was that before Adam Smith?). Amazing that from such a simple beginning Ben should have been able to come up with insights like the ones in today's column.

So Ben Stein is a clown. Why should we care? After all, if people actually wanted to be informed, they wouldn't be reading Stein in the first place, would they? And anti-rich resentment sells newspapers. We want the NYT to prosper, don't we?

Deeper concerns about the effects of such rhetoric on public policy and on our criminal justice system is really the concern of blogs, not mighty newspapers.

Update: Tom Kirkendall adds his critique of Stein's LBO analysis.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c88c69e200e5505445c98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ben Stein speaks:

Comments

Economics Teacher: . . . Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics.

Actually I think there was a $10M bar mitzvah last year, and the father was making tons of money from defense contracting in Iraq.

That hardly constitutes a trend however.

Our troops in Iraq are undertrained and underequipped due to good old fashioned incompetence. How completely sad.

And Bush is charging the cost of the war to my childrens' future. Damn him anyway.

Only lawyers and economists are qualified to be experts on everything.

Ben is double trouble.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.