My policies

  • Although this blog does not accept comments, I welcome thoughtful non-anonymous emails to lribstei at gmail.com and may discuss them in blog posts. Let me know if I may use your name. Although I'm a law professor, I don't give legal advice.

Me

My audience

Blog powered by TypePad

« Ben Stein gets his clown suit back | Main | Cheap donuts and expensive broccoli »

Blackstone and the publicly traded law firm

In light of the Blackstone public offering, I wonder if there are any other partnerships that earn big fees that might go public. Like law firms, for example?

Law firms, of course, just aren’t like publicly traded corporations. They have to be partnerships, or else they will lose their discipline and their cachet. I mean, you may as well be talking about Goldman, Sachs going public, for God's sake. Oh, wait. . .

But then the investment banking and buyout and hedge fund businesses aren't like just giving advice. You'd never be able to capitalize expert advice, would you? Oh, wait. . .

Well, of course there are ethical rules about selling equity shares in law firms to non-lawyers. But those rules could be changed. It's far from clear that it's in clients' interests to require firms that practice law be law-only and lawyer-controlled.  See my article, Ethical Rules, Agency Costs and Law Firm Structure, 84 Virginia Law Review 1707 (1998).

Moreover, even if we insist on lawyer control, that doesn't necessarly preclude a Blackstone-type structure, in which the public owners have little or no control.

Now, you might say more convincingly that there isn't enough value in a law firm to capitalize. Lawyers are involved in the huge transactions, but Blackstone rakes off most of the dough. But then you should wonder why that has to be. After all, lawyers are supposed to be "transaction cost engineers," in Ron Gilson's term. Many combine business expertise with legal knowhow. Why should a lawyer like Bruce Wasserstein have to go into private equity to make the big bucks?

For more on the future of big law firms, including a possibly publicly traded future, see here and here. And here's some recent advice for law firms based on the private equity model.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c88c69e200e55056d4c68834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blackstone and the publicly traded law firm:

Comments

It might be timely to take a look at a Note I wrote while a student at Georgetown University Law Center:

Modifying Model Rule 5.4 to Allow for Minority Ownership of Law Firms by NonLawyers, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Spring 2000).

Father Drinan, the founder of the Journal of Legal Ethics (one of his many accomplishments) and my Legal Ethics Seminar Professor, never could get over my choice of topic. When it was my turn to report on the progress I was making on my paper, he would always start out the conversation by asking me where my idea came from.

Admittedly, not the greatest paper, but, then as now, an interesting topic.

Australia's Slater & Gordon are launching an IPO, which explores some of these issues - the success of which will be interesting to watch, for a whole bunch of reasons.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.